|
APIMS and FTIR remain the preferred
analytical tools for monitoring impurities in the electronic specialty gases
used by the semiconductor industry, although other tools such as CRDS are
currently finding application in selected cases. FTIR spectroscopy offers the advantage
of the simultaneous measurement of all gaseous species that exhibit dipole
moment changes during vibrations at concentration levels down to the ppb level.
FTIR also offers the advantage of transferring all contact with the corrosive and/or
toxic gases to a long or short path gas cell that contains the sample gas. Therefore,
the design and the materials of which the gas cell is fabricated become the
critical features determining the quality of the impurity analyses. This paper
will present and review the advantages and disadvantages of several gas cell
configurations on the market today, including the following features: optical
design (multipass “white cell,” folded path, direct pass), pathlength,
materials of construction (stainless steel, aluminum, glass), mirror substrates
and coatings, windows, cell finishes/coatings, cell volumes, measurement wavelength
(IR & UV), sample gas composition, cell pre-treatment and decontamination,
energy throughput, and sensitivity.
The uses of electronic specialty gases in semiconductor applications
are several, including:
-
Ion Implantation
-
Thin Film Deposition
-
Sputtering Operations
-
Physical Vapor Deposition
-
Chemical Vapor Deposition
-
Wafer Cleaning and Etching
-
Synthesis of Compound Semiconductors
Many of these applications involve the use of very high purity
gases that are both corrosive and toxic, such as HCl, HBr, Cl2, WF6,
SiH4, SiH2Cl2, NH3, PH3,
etc. It is the chemical nature of these gases that creates great problems for
most analytical methods. Among the problems for both the user and the analyst
are:
1. Many of these gases can not be produced at the highest purity
required by the semiconductor industry, a major contaminant being moisture;
2. The moisture content of the halogen-type gases makes them
highly acidic;
3. The chemical reactivity of these gases and their impurities
leads to degradation of optics, materials, and seals in both process tools and
analytical instruments;
4. The acid gases react with and destroy the electronic elements
in some mass spectrometers, gas chromatographs, and electrical conductivity
devices; they also chemically degrade the mirrors and windows in gas absorption
cells;
5. When sampling of a gas stream is required, the expansive
cooling of the gas can yield liquid droplets, which are even more chemically
destructive of electronic and optical elements because of their highly
concentrated nature;
6. For the process tool operator, these gases are highly toxic if
leakage occurs due to any number of equipment failures: breaks in process
lines, bad welds, degraded vacuum connectors or seals, operator error, etc.;
7. Most critical, perhaps, is the fact that variations in the quality
of the process gas, due in many cases to moisture as an impurity, interferes with
the kinetics of the semiconductor wafer etching or treatment process.
The analytical tools being used today for monitoring the quality
of the electronic specialty gases all have their advantages and disadvantages.
Key points for each are given in Table 1.

Both APIMS and FTIR are the standard analytical methods accepted
by the semiconductor industry for qualifying the purity of cleaning, etching,
and treatment gases. FTIR is broadly used also for PFC emission measurements.
When FTIR is coupled with long path gas cells, it is not only
applied to semiconductor gas monitoring but also to a broad spectrum of other
analytical applications, including combustion and stack gas compositions,
tobacco blending, fire and forestry, hydrogen fuel cells, battery tests, and
medical and air reduction gases. This breadth of applications has led to a
multiplicity of long path gas cell designs and manufacturers. Illustrated in
Figure 1, are a few of these cells, from Infrared Analysis, Gemini Scientific
Instruments, Axiom Analytical, Thermo Nicolet, CIC Photonics, among others.

Figure 1. Widely-Used Long Path GasCells
Several different optical designs of long path gas cells exist in
the field of analytical applications, each having specific or unique features
as shown in Table 2.

Over the years, the white cell has been the most popular and
widely used gas cell, because it can be readily fabricated from a variety of
construction materials at a broad range of prices. The Folded Path cell offers
fewer mirror reflections per unit pathlength, but its vertical height is not
conducive to industrial applications. The Herriott cell and the CRDS Cavity
cell both achieve PPT sensitivity due to their exceptionally long pathlengths,
but a distinct laser frequency is required for each molecular absorption line
to be monitored.
The application of long path gas cells to electronic specialty gases
has introduced a number of material and performance problems due to the
chemical reactivity of many of these gases. Such problems are listed in the
next four tables, Tables 3 – 6. The information in these tables is based upon
the experiences of the author and many customers.
Table 3 identifies the principal problems and their frequency of
occurrence. With stainless steel cells and nickel-plated stainless steel cells,
degradation of the cell body rarely occurs even after years of service. Some
prospective users request that the cell body be made from a high nickel-content
alloy, such as Monel or Hastelloy, but fabrication from those materials is very
expensive. The author has found that nickel-plated stainless steel serves equally
well at much lower cost. Contamination from gas-phase produced powders on the
mirrors or windows and the failure of O-rings and C-seals are also low in occurrence.

Overall, the infrared transmission by the input and output windows
remains usable, so long as the windows are matched to the gases being analyzed.
But window degradation will occur after weeks or months of usage. It is recommended
that the windows be replaced when the energy throughput drops below 75% of its
original value or when the analysis instrument is down for switching to a
different electronic gas.
Most people may find this hard to believe, but user caused failures
are ranked medium to high in frequency of occurrence. Common among these causes
are: mixing of a new gas sample with a different residual gas in the gas cell,
which leads to the formation of a powder or film that in turn coats the windows
and mirrors; overheating the gas cell causing degradation of the O-rings; and
permitting liquefied forms of the gases to condense on the mirrors without
adequate flushing between periods of usage.
No highly reflective mirror coating exists that will not succumb to
slow chemical degradation by the acid gases over months of continuous usage. The
rate and degree of degradation varies greatly from one acid gas to another and
among the other electronic specialty gases. The best way to monitor this degradation
is to monitor the energy throughput on a daily or weekly basis; when the energy
throughput drops below 75% of its original value, then either degradation of
the windows or mirrors must be suspected.
The potential of acid droplet nucleation upon expansion of the gas
at the inlet to the gas cell is controversial in practice but obviously has a
measure of theoretical probability. If droplet nucleation does occur and if
those droplets settle on the mirror surfaces, the rate of chemical interaction between
the liquid droplet and the mirror material will be much higher than the
interaction of the gas with the mirror. Physical inspection of degraded mirrors,
particularly from HBr exposure, reveals microscopic size pits, which tends to support
the premise of droplet nucleation.
More can be said about the chemical integrity and utility of
various cell body materials, as summarized in Table 4. Borosilicate type glass
is widely used in gas cells. But glass suffers from two major problems:
susceptibility to breakage in industrial settings, and very high retention of
moisture molecules due to hydrogen bonding with oxygen sites on the glass
surface. Both aluminum and nickel-plated aluminum suffer from acid gas attack;
in the latter case, it is well established that the acid gas molecules
penetrate through or under the nickel plating causing peeling of the nickel and
direct exposure to the aluminum. Teflon-coated glass or aluminum is also not
viable because of high moisture retention.

Nickel-plated brass and electropolished stainless steel exhibit
good resistance to acid attack, but once again the retention of adsorbed
moisture molecules by the oxygen sites of stainless steel diminishes its
utility in applications where moisture measurements are critical. Nickel-plated
stainless steel and the high nickel-content alloys are the best materials for
construction, because of their high resistance to acid attack and their low
retention of moisture molecules.
The mirrors are certainly the most critical component of multipath
and folded-path gas cells. The chemical composition of both the mirror
substrate and the reflective coating determine the resistance to attack by
electronic gases and the ultimate energy throughput of the cells. Table 5 lists
some of the issues associated with the selection of the substrate material.
While stainless steel is a preferred substrate because of its lower cost to fabricate
into a mirror, it requires multi-layer coatings, including gold as the primary
reflective surface, which is expensive. There are claims that uncoated mirrors
made of Hastelloy, Monel, or pure nickel are sufficiently reflective in the infrared
to use in multi-path cells, but no definitive evidence exists to substantiate
those claims. One exception is Axiom Analytical, which has used pure nickel
mirrors in its folded-path cells, but such cells require only a few
reflections.

The longevity of the reflective coatings on mirrors is partly
based upon the substrate material, but it is more dependent upon the coating composition
and the gases to which the coating is subjected. For years MgF2 has
been a preferred protective coating over gold because it enhances the
resistance to physical contact. That property is still valid, but more important
is the fact that MgF2 enhances the chemical resistance to the
electronic gases. In addition, chromium and nickel are commonly used to bind
gold to the substrate. Where moisture measurements are the issue, nickel is better
than chromium because of the absence of hydrogen-bonding that is associated
with CrO sites.
Table 6 lists three reflective coating structures and their
relative longevity with various gases that are within the experience of the
author. For the halogen-containing acid gases, MgF2 protective
coatings greatly enhance the life of the gold coatings, except for HBr. HBr is highly
reactive with many materials, and some evidence exists that it even reacts with
gold. HF becomes a real problem if it liquefies and settles on the mirror
surfaces.

In order to strengthen the chemical resistance of MgF2/Au mirrors further,
this author has experimented with binder elements other than Ni and with
varying deposition thickness for each layer. A formulation has been devised
which offers con-siderable improvement over the MgF2/Au/Ni
composition that is widely used for highly reflective gold mirrors. These
comments apply specifically to coatings on stainless steel.
The hydrogen-containing gases employed as treatment gases in the
synthesis of compound semiconductors are much less chemically reactive with various
mirror coatings, but their toxicity raises concerns about the physical integrity
of the gas cells and of safety for the system operators.
The reflective coatings used with mirrors for CRDS are dielectric
materials. Selection of a specific dielectric must be matched with the
wavelength of the laser beam employed, which in turn is dependent upon the
molecular absorption line being monitored. The dielectrics offer extremely high
reflectivity —of the order of 99.999%; but one must be concerned with how the reflectivity
may deteriorate in the presence of corrosive acid or basic gases.
After mirrors, window materials are the next gas cell component
subject to contamination and degradation. In addition, the window material must
be chosen to match the infrared transmission range required for the analysis.
For the determination of moisture as an impurity in the electronic specialty
gases, Table 7 identifies the window materials most commonly used. BaF2 is
widely used for a number of the gases. However, AgCl is preferred for the
halogen-containing gases. KBr is the least expensive window material and has
high transmission throughout the infrared. Because of its hydroscopic nature,
it has to be replaced more frequently than the other windows. Anti-reflective coated
ZnSe is a real workhorse as a window material because of its physical strength
and its wide transmission range; it is also chemically resistant to most all of
the electronic gases.

Turning attention back to the physical design of the gas cells,
the gas flow patterns from point of input to output become important. A variety
of white cell geometries are in use, which serve as a good illustration of gas
flow patterns characteristic of other cell geometries as well. The most common
geometry utilizes small diameter (1/4”) inlet and outlet tubes both mounted at
the top of the “White” cell, as illustrated in Figure 2b. This geometry leads
to an uneven U-shaped flow pattern with some dead-volume spaces and very long
gas sample exchange rates (minutes). In addition, if the inlet gas pressure is
high relative to that in the cell volume, droplet nucleation may occur due to
adiabatic expansion.
Figure 2a illustrates a pattern associated with the inlet and
outlet ports being at the top and bottom of the gas cell. Once again the
pattern is irregular and dead volume spaces are likely, both of which lead to
long sample exchange times. Figure 2c shows a configuration with essentially no
dead volume, laminar gas flow, and rapid sample exchanges. The specific feature
producing these benefits is a circumferential gas flow trough at both the top
and bottom of the cell, each being connected to a short inlet or outlet tube.
The incoming gas flows around the trough and over its edge to produce a
“waterfall-type” of laminar flow throughout the volume of the cell. Sample
exchange times are as short as 45 seconds for a cell volume of 600 cc. Most of
the electronic gases are very expensive, so the producers and users want to
conserve the amount of gas required for purity analysis and verification.

Figure 2a, 2b, 2c. Gas Flow Patterns
With white cells and with folded-path cells, the infrared energy
throughput is a strong measure of its analytical performance. The higher the
net energy throughput, the higher the sensitivity for detecting small
concentrations of gaseous species. However, energy throughputs vary greatly
among the suppliers of the gas cells due to the surface quality of the mirror
substrate, the reflectivity of the mirror coatings, the mirror surface areas,
the distance between the mirrors (radius of curvature), the number of
reflections required for the maximum pathlength, and the alignment of the
mirror sets.
Table 8 shows typical energy throughputs for three gas cells
manufactured by CIC Photonics, Inc. All three cells are alike in overall mirror
quality and alignment, except for the number of reflections required. The 4Runner
(4.0-meter) cell exhibits one of the highest energy throughputs, 50-60%, for a
multipath cell on the market today.

For those gas cells that exhibit lower energy throughputs, the
most common reason is that the mirror areas are too small relative to the size
the multi-reflecting infrared beam, with much beam energy being lost over the
edges of the mirrors. This situation exists because of user demands to reduce
the cell volume and hence the cell diameter.
Many first users of gas cells estimate the pathlength required for
their application by performing a simple Beer's Law calculation, with some
assumption of the molecular absorption coefficient; alternatively, they apply a
experimental value derived from a quick and easy direct path measurement.
Having such an estimate, they then proceed to calculate the cell pathlength
required for their new gas analysis application.
However, this approach fails to take account of the following factors
that do influence significantly the total performance of a multipath gas cell:
the signal to noise ratio that is influenced by the optoelectronics of the
gascell/FTIR-spectrometer hardware system; the infrared spectral reflectivity
of the mirror coating; the optical quality of the mirror surface; and the dependence
of the energy throughput directly upon the alignment of the mirrors.
Therefore, it is best to characterize the absolute sensitivity of
a multipath gas cell in terms of a functional relationship involving all of the
above parameters. As a consequence, a 4-meter white cell with these parameters
all optimized—e.g. a 4Runner, can and does perform equal to or better than a 20
to 30-meter cell when the parameters are not all optimized.

In summary, the following findings apply to the selection of the
best long path gas cell for a variety of gas analysis circumstances, but apply
particularly to impurity analyses of the electronic specialty gases used in the
semiconductor industry:
-
The FTIR/gas cell instrument is more versatile than APIMS
-
Gas cells must be acid-resistant with low moisture retention
-
Ni-plated stainless steel and Ni-alloys work best with the acid
gases
-
Mirror coatings strongly determine the cell performance
-
Pathlengths less than or equal to 10-meters are adequate for ppb
levels
-
Window selection depends upon the gas sample
Absolute Sensitivity is a function of mirror quality factors in
addition to molecular absorption coefficient and pathlength.
Acknowledgements: Patricia Clarke and Christina Perez, BOC Edwards;
George Ryals, Solkatronic Chemicals; Rob Torres, Matheson Tri-Gas; Phil Hanst,
Infrared Analysis; Mike Doyle, Axiom Analytical; Dave Carlson, Applied
Materials; Steve Hanst, Gemini Scientific Instruments.
|